Psychological egoism is the doctrine that the only thing anyone is capable of desiring or pursuing ultimately is. a. entirely selfish goals. b. his or her own. Psychological egoism is the thesis that we are always deep down motivated by . does not concern oneself, but it is hardly altruistic (Feinberg /, §9, p. Psychological egoism is a universal claim: it is a claim about all human actions; the .. Feinberg doesn’t just critique this argument for hedonistic psychological.
|Published (Last):||24 September 2016|
|PDF File Size:||7.47 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.69 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It is psycho,ogical that this argument proves that ethical egoism generates all of the standard duties to others. Even if egoistic ultimate desires lead to unhappiness, that would only show that egoistically motivated people will find this unfortunate.
Psychological Egoism | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Finally, Sidgwick might be claiming that my point of view, like an impartial point of view, is non-arbitrary. A broadly Humean account of motivation and ethics that covers, among others things, some issues at the intersection of egoism and biology see ch.
Because he has no means to achieve that end, however, “[i]t takes little imagination [ So the theory is arguably more difficult to refute than many have tended to suppose. Egoism as a Theory of Human Motives. Opponents have argued that psychological egoism is not more parsimonious than other theories.
And in these cases, as in the case of the imperfectly correlated pain and bodily injury, there seems usually to be enough affect.
Proponents cite evidence from introspection: Indeed, the only major figures in the history of philosophy to endorse the view explicitly are arguably Thomas Hobbes and Jeremy Bentham.
It allows for weakness of will, since in weakness of will cases I am still aiming at my own welfare; I am weak in that I do not act as I aim. This allows for action that fails to maximize perceived self-interest, but rules out the sort of behavior psychological egoists like to target — such as altruistic behavior or motivation by thoughts of duty alone.
In fact, it is empirically testable, as we shall see below. Against the self-administered reward hypothesis, Batson found that the mood of high-empathy subjects depended on whether they believed that help was needed, whether or not they could do the helping, rather than on whether they helped and so could self-reward. Joshua May – – Internet Encyclopeida of Philosophy.
Empathy fsinberg cause an unpleasant experience that subjects believe they can stop by helping; or subjects might think failing to help in cases of high empathy is more likely to lead to punishment by others, or that helping here is more likely to be rewarded by others; or subjects might think this about self-administered punishment or reward.
The third argument psychologiical the thesis [near total self-deception] is unlikely: The issue of what makes for a moral theory is contentious.
Rational Egoism Rational egoism claims that it is necessary and sufficient for an action to be rational that it maximize one’s self-interest. The point is that we must avoid simple leaps from biology to psychology without substantial argument see also Stich et al.
According to Butler, the experience of pleasure upon eating some food allows us to infer the existence of a desire for food. This is a descriptive rather than normative view, since it only makes claims about how things are, not how feinberh ought to be. If self-interest is identified with the satisfaction of all of one’s preferences, then all intentional action is self-interested at least if intentional actions are always explained by citing preferences, as most believe.
The present-aim theory does not. It seems reasonable for me to care specially about B and C. If, say, I break my promises whenever it is in my direct self-interest to do so, others will not accept my psychologicaal, and may even attack me.
The psychological egoist might reply that some such account must be right. I might, for example, profit more from helping the local Opera society refurbish its hall than I would from giving to famine relief in Africa, but standard moral theories would rank famine relief as more important than Opera hall improvements. The rational egoist must argue that hers is a case where preferences are decisive. For a very different argument to show again that an alternative to morality is less minimal than expected — directed more at the instrumental theory than rational egoism — see Korsgaard Yet Butler’s opponent, the egoist, maintains that the desire for food is subsequent to and dependent on an ultimate desire for pleasure or some other form of self-interest:.
A host of experiments have similarly disconfirmed a range of egoistic hypotheses. Gathers empirical evidence about the prosocial behavior of young children—in particular that they will spontaneously help others who appear to be in need. How to cite this entry. One might cite our most confident judgments about rational action and claim that rational egoism best fits these.
A third argument, like Moore’s, claims that ethical egoism is inconsistent in various ways. V and concluding chapter. This article has no associated abstract. But he pretty clearly rejects psychological egoism, which is arguably contrary to several of his utilitarian predecessors.
Joel Feinberg, Psychological Egoism – PhilPapers
But fit with motivation is hardly decisive; any normative theory, including ethical egoism, is intended to guide and criticize our choices, rather than simply endorse whatever we do. Attempts to rebut challenges to the empathy-altruism hypothesis based on experiments done since the early s.
Thus, behaviorism uses but does not strictly support psychological hedonism over other understandings of the ultimate drive of human behavior. So I’m missing something or I’m misunderstanding the force of the conclusion. Argues against psychological egoism in a variety of ways, most notably by attempting to reveal how implausible it is on its face once its commitments are made clear.
The essay was originally composed by Professor Feinberg for his students inand appeared regularly in his Reason and Responsibility of which there were many editions published by Wadsworth. Several other egoistic views are related to, but distinct from psychological egoism.