Addendum to the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual: Scoring of the EORTC QLQ- CPAL. Mogens Groenvold and Morten Aagaard Petersen on behalf of the. PDF | On Apr 1, , Mogens Groenvold and others published EORTC QLQ- CPAL: The new standard in the assessment of health-related. This study aimed at developing a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30, one of the most widely used health-related quality of life questionnaires in.
|Published (Last):||25 October 2018|
|PDF File Size:||16.66 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.23 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
General contact details of provider: Item response theory methods were used to shorten eorfc. More about this item Keywords data management ; questionnaire scoring ; Statistics Access qq-c15-pal download statistics Corrections All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Niels Henrik Bruun, If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here.
This allows to link dortc profile to this item. Although significant overlap exists between both tools, there is a marked difference in the aspects of QoL assessed. A shortened questionnaire for cancer qlq-c15-pall in palliative care ‘ European Journal of Cancervol. Each instrument has unique strengths and weaknesses and choice between these tools is dependent on the investigator and study needs.
Corrections All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. Shorter quality-of-life QoL assessments are beneficial for palliative patients as they reduce burden associated with completing personal, and at times stressful, questionnaires.
Niels Henrik Bruun Aarhus University.
You can help adding them by using this form. European Journal of Cancer42 155 – European Journal of CancerVol. A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care”. N2 – This study aimed at developing a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30, one of the most widely used health-related quality of life questionnaires in oncology, for palliative care research. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc. Four scales were shortened without reducing measurement precision.
Download full text from publisher File URL: Scoring, organization and item format are different; however, response options and recall period are the same. The study included interviews with 41 patients and 66 health care professionals in palliative care to determine the appropriateness, relevance and importance of the various domains of the QLQ-C Depending on the research questions, it may be supplemented by additional items, modules or questionnaires.
A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care Research output: Both tools cover the core items relevant to patients with advanced cancers and can be supplemented with disease-specific tools.
European Journal of Cancer. This module should be installed from within Stata by typing “ssc install qlqc15”. More about this item Keywords data management ; questionnaire scoring ; Statistics Access and download statistics. Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.
There was a problem providing the content you requested
If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the “citations” tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation. If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. When requesting a correction, please mention this item’s handle: Windows users should not attempt to download these files with a web browser.
A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care. Important dimensions not covered by the questionnaire were identified.
Future studies should directly compare these two tools and validate their use through a number of administration modes. We have no references for this item. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.
You can help correct errors and omissions. The purpose of this qq-c15-pal was to conduct a review of studies utilizing these two palliative-specific QoL instruments, their development and their relative strengths for use in advanced cancer patients.
A comparison between both questionnaires in terms of development, characteristics, validation and use was conducted.
QLQC Stata module for scoring of the EORTC QLQ-CPAL
It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about. Help us Corrections Found an error or omission? Main research site Explore Bristol Research.